MS5220 Consistency Index (CI)
1. pairwise comparison matrix of the 4 site selection criteria X the preference vector for the criteria.
ie., Pij X Qj ( j,j 咁乘)
The result is Rj.
2. Rj/Qj
we divide each of these values by the corresponding weight from the criteria preference vector.
3. sum the values and take the average = 16.6257/4 = 4.1564.
4. consistency index ( CI) = ( 4.1564 - n )/ (n-1)
5. If CI =0 then Southcrop woule be a perfectly consistent decision maker.
6. An acceptable level of consistency is determined by comparing the CI to a random index, RI, which is the consistency index of a randomly generated pairwise comparison index.
7. the Degree of Consistency for the pairwise comparisons in the decision criteria mstrix is determined by computing the ration of CI to RI
CI/RI
( You still NEED to evaluate the pairwise comparison of EACH of the four individual crteria matrix before we could be sure the entire AHP for this problem was consistent! )
8. If CI/RI < 0.10, then normal. Otherwise, it is INconsistent!
1. 良知者，孟子所謂「 是非之心，人皆有之」者也。是非之心，不待慮而知，不待學而能
，是故謂之良知。是乃天命之性，吾心之本體，自然良知明覺者也。
2. 凡意念之發，吾心之良知無有不自知者。其善歟，惟吾心之良知自知之，其不善歟，亦惟吾心之良知自知之。是皆無所與於他人者也。故雖小人為不善，既已無所不至，然其見君子，則必厭然掩其不善，而著其善者，是亦可以見其良知之有不容於自昧者也。今欲別善惡以誠其意，惟在致其良知之
所知焉爾。何則？
3. 意念之發，吾心之良知既知其為善矣，使其不能誠有以好之，而復背而去之，則是以善為惡，而自昧其知善之良知矣。
4.意念之所發，吾之良知既知其為不善矣，使其不能誠有以惡之，而復蹈而為之，則是以惡為善，而自昧其知惡之良知矣。若是，則雖曰知之，猶不知也，意其可得而誠乎？
5. 今於良知之善惡者，無不誠好而誠惡之，則不自欺其良知而意可誠也已。然欲致其良知，亦豈影響恍惚而懸空無實之謂乎？
6. 是必實有其事矣。故致知必在於格物。物者，事也，凡意之所發必有其事，意所在之事謂之物。格者，正也，正其不正以歸於正之謂也。正其不正者，去惡之謂也。歸於正者，為善之謂也。夫是之謂格。
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen