熱血時報: 鄭松泰陳雲十一發聯名信 促請美國通過對港法案

熱血時報: 鄭松泰陳雲十一發聯名信　促請美國通過對港法案



熱血時報: 鄭松泰陳雲十一發聯名信　促請美國通過對港法案



- 熱血時報網站連結 http://www.passiontimes.hk/article/10-01-2019/56360
- Copyright © 2019


【鄭松泰陳雲十一發聯名信　促請美國通過對港法案】



因應港共政府及警察近期的暴行變本加厲，熱血公民主席、立法會議員鄭松泰博士，聯同香港復興會創辦人陳雲博士於10月1日發表公開信，促請美國國會議員通過及嚴格執行有關香港的法案，制裁中共暴行。

信件開宗明義指出，雖然有人將香港喻為1990年成功抗共的西柏林，但如果美國未能成功通過、並嚴格執行《香港人權及民主法案》等相關法案，永恒警視香港，香港只會成為1975年淪陷於共產黨之手的越南西貢。信件指出中共宣布《中英聯合聲明》無效，多次違反《基本法》、濫捕港人及施行酷刑，顯示美國當年錯估形勢，容讓香港主權移交，令香港民主自治缺乏支持，信件促請美國仍未作決定的議員認清中共本質，支持法案通過，為香港帶來希望。

信件亦指出2018年12月香港保安局前往新疆「研究反恐方法」，局長李家超聲稱中共對待新疆人的方式是「人道」，加上近日警隊稱香港異見人士為「曱甴」（蟑螂），警方高級警司稱被警圍毆的人士為「黃色物體」，是證明在港不服中共價值觀的人，有可能如維吾爾族人遭種族滅絕，因此美國國會道義上應支持通過有關香港的法案，將人道災難撲滅於萌芽狀態。



信件提出自9月1日起，有大量指控警察於新屋嶺對抗爭者施行酷刑及性侵，而大量警方單方面宣布「無可疑」的自殺事件，有理由懷疑政府操控法醫調查，掩飾有抗爭者遭警察私刑報復而死的真相，因此美國要通過法案，警告美國可能撤回承認香港的獨特地位，通過《2019香港人權及民主法案》制裁香港警察、中國領導人及前領導人、參與暴政的官員及公務員、襲擊抗爭者的三合會成員。由於習近平正以報復的態度回歸毛澤東的思想政策，因此美國需要通過法案，保障香港有關「一國兩制」而來的自由主義傳統可以保存，即使可能影響香港市民生活，但正如美國當年為對抗日本帝國殘酷統治，難免出兵傷及無辜，議員亦應以同樣方式看待當前的局勢。


信件最後提醒美國人，要理解鄧小平雖於1992年聲稱他們不再是共產主義者，但黨派結構顯示他們仍嚴格遵守列寧主義，他們的「中國特色社會主義」其實是國家資本主義，將審判員及參與者合而為一，令中國在中美貿易得益，並以盈餘大幅擴充軍備，而同時壓制所有不絕對服從中共的意識及身份，如美國對香港不採取任何行動，並任由中國壓制美國成為第一大國，香港現時所發生的一切，將會發生在美國所有人身上。


聯名信原文：https://www.facebook.com/chengchungtai/posts/1303231039851250

- 熱血時報網站連結 http://www.passiontimes.hk/article/10-01-2019/56360
- Copyright © 2019


全文︰http://www.passiontimes.hk/article/10-01-2019/56360





【An Open Letter to All Members of the United States Congress on Upcoming Legislations Regarding Hong Kong】

October 1, 2019

Some compare Hong Kong to former West Berlin, which was triumphant in 1990. We may foresee Hong Kong as Saigon of former South Vietnam, which fell in 1975, if legislations mentioned below are passed, but not forcefully enforced, and eternal vigilance is not maintained.

Dr. Hon. Cheng Chung-tai and Dr. Chin Wan-kan are writing to The United States Congress to set out what they consider the issues it may wish to prioritize as follow ups of the upcoming legislations of “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019” (H.R.3289, S.1838), “Hong Kong Policy Reevaluation Act of 2019” (S.1824), “Placing Restrictions on Teargas Exports and Crowd Control Technology to Hong Kong Act” ( H.R.4270), and the possible amendments of “United States–Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992” (P.L. no. 102-383m 106 Stat. 1448).

First of all, we are deeply appreciative of all the Members of the United States Congress who support toward the freedom and democratic causes of Hong Kong, and have already made up their minds to vote “aye” for all the above motions.

—Why we have come down to this?—

For the Senators and Representatives who are still undecided on the four Bills and one Resolution regarding Hong Kong issues. We would like to point out that:

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has already declared 1984 “Sino-British Joint Declaration” as “void and only covered the period from the signing in 1984 until the handover in 1997”, and repeatedly violates its own “Hong Kong Basic Law” (the most glaring example at the moment is to do with Article 28, which states that “No Hong Kong resident shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful arrest, detention or imprisonment. Arbitrary or unlawful search of the body of any resident or deprivation or restriction of the freedom of the person shall be prohibited. Torture of any resident or arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of the life of any resident shall be prohibited”). Both the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law should be regarded as a Social Contract between China and the people of Hong Kong, while the former is an international agreement, and acts as a test of character for Post-Maoist China, which they fail miserably at the moment. Especially it is increasingly clear that Xi Jinping is pursuing Neo-Maoist, Pan-Sino Chauvinist (which is as toxic as Pan-Germanism in around one century ago), totalitarian policies assisted by cutting edge surveillance, AI and Big Data technologies, and taking advantage of “restore Law and Order” pretext. Hong Kong will not be exempted.

The ongoing crisis of Hong Kong is not an isolated incident. Our predicament is at first, one of the prices of Cold War Triumph over Soviet Union, then thirty years of the United States’ miscalculation of PRC’s strategic intention, and the subsequent “Engagement Policy”. The former made 1997 Handover possible, while the later made Hong Kong’s Democratic and Autonomy aspiration an under-supported, long and desperate uphill struggle, as in the defense of Bataan Peninsula for three decades. Only recent Chinese Communist Party’s overreach on all fronts, and the US awakening on PRC’s true nature, give us a glimmer of hope.

—What is at stake?—

We would like to highlight several points to connect the dots, in order to reflect the gravity of the situation.

Earlier in November 2018, a Professor of National Defence University of People’s Liberation Army (PLA), who is also an active duty PLA Major General, said in a public speech that, according to Maoist Class Analysis, people of Hong Kong were “worst of the kind”, because one third of them was ex-Landlords who escaped from Land Reform, another one third escaped from the Great Leap Forward Movement (note: other Political Movements should be counted too), the rest of them was locally born with heavy British influence. The recent incidents will certainly strengthen his opinion. Hong Kong people who are unwilling to conform with CCP’s values could eventually receive Uyghurs-like treatments, or even a downright genocide. It should not be considered too far-fetched.

In December 2018, HKSAR’s Security Bureau sent seven high ranking officials to Xinjiang to “study counter-terrorism methods”. In January 2019, the Secretary for Security John Lee Ka-chiu said that “everything we saw was humane”. The official urged people not to wear “colored glasses” and gleefully noted that the methods employed to suppress terrorism had succeeded because there “had been almost no real attacks in the past two years”. In other words, an almost word-for-word repetition of the official Communist Party line (see “Does John Lee have no shame?” by Stephen Vines at ejinsight.com on January 11, 2019).

Throughout the Summer of Discontent, Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) (as did many pro-Communists) constantly called the protesters as “cockroaches”, no matter in internal groups in smartphone messaging apps or in intercom conversations (overheard by reporters in many occasions). As recent as 23 September, during a routine HKPF’s press briefing, Acting Senior Superintendent (Operations) of New Territories North Region Vasco Williams denied any instance of misconduct (referring to the back alley lynching of an elderly protester who dressed in yellow T-shirt and yellow vest by police officers), “You mentioned a video that showed what appeared to be an officer kicking a ‘yellow object’ on the ground,” Williams later feebly argued that he meant the image to be grainy and should not be taken as physical evidence. Yet it was another example of police’s dehumanization of protesters, as a psychological preparation for committing genocide.
For the reasons above, a basic moral obligation for all Congressmen to vote “aye” for all upcoming legislations regarding Hong Kong is totally sound and significant, so as to nip this early stage of humanitarian disaster in the bud.

—Overlooked war crimes of Hong Kong Police Force—

We would also want to bring one crucial point pertinent to “Placing Restrictions on Teargas Exports and Crowd Control Technology to Hong Kong Act” (H.R.4270):

HKPF’s Special Tactical Squad (STS), or more commonly known as “Raptors Team” by the locals, is a paramilitary task force or a crack unit which composes of senior instructors of Hong Kong Police College, elite members of Police Tactical Unit, famous Special Duties Unit, Counter Terrorism Response Unit, Airport Security Unit, and Railway Response Team which was set up just half a year ago. The units aforementioned were formed with Counter-Terrorism in mind and with special force-grade training. STS would only be assembled during civil unrest. In a nutshell, STS is similar to former Soviet/ CIS member states’ Ministry of Internal Affairs Special Forces, aiming at suppressing civil disturbances with iron fists.

Thus, STS’s heavy hand approach to protesters should be considered as war crimes and a major military dishonor among those special force trained members. STS weapons are almost exclusively NATO-origin. The aforementioned Counter-Terrorism units are likewise all having close co-operation relationships with NATO member nations. Considering the Security Bureau officials’ recent visit to Xinjiang, the bureau might have already passed on their technical and tactical know-hows to PLA, People’s Armed Police Force (PAP) and/ or other intelligence and security apparatus.

—Give them no quarters—

We are likewise aware that, some Hong Kong Pan-Democrat Legislators and famous Social Activists felt that, the US sanctions should concentrate on HKSAR officials, and refrain from invoking “Nuclear Option” (i.e. “United States–Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992”), for it will affect the livelihood of ordinary Hong Kong people greatly. While we should not recklessly put ordinary livelihood at risk, but the harsh realities are:

Since 1 September, there has been an unusual high count of suicide (over thirty), all of them were unilaterally declared by Hong Kong Police Force as “nothing suspicious”, while there were widespread allegations of serious tortures and sexual assaults against protesters at police stations and especially the remote San Uk Ling Holding Centre. Circumstantially, there are reasonable suspicions that those “suicide cases” may be fatalities of police retaliatory lynching and cover-up, since the authorities monopolize forensic investigations.

While it was extremely lucky that the Cold War was won without Nuclear Exchange, the Western Bloc Nuclear Deterrent kept the Free World generally safe and prosperous in the duration of the Cold War. For the same reason, a constant warning of the US withdrawing admission of Hong Kong unique status is still necessary to deter further transgressions of freedom and autonomy.

Keeping it in mind that if HKSAR or PRC government declares State of Emergency by invoking “Emergency Regulations Ordinance” or “Hong Kong Basic Law” Article 18, it will yield the same effect of “Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Ordinance 2019”, it should be deemed as one of the “tripwire causes” of the aforementioned “Nuclear Option”.

Moreover, the sanctions of “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019” should not be just limited to HKSAR, HKPF, PRC leaders, former leaders, and high-ranking officials who contribute to this slippery slope of tyranny, but even middle to lower ranking functionaries, no matter from public or private sector, who commit “Banality of Evil”, and the last but not least, Triad members who carry out attacks against protesters (especially on 21 July in Yuen Long), should all be severely punished.

Since Xi Jinping is reverting to Maoist ideology and policies with a vengeance, it makes “One Country, Two Systems” more relevant and necessary for Hong Kong as ever. Since the “twenty-two-year implementation” was far from Hong Kongers’ satisfaction, and we are near to the half way point of the fifty-year timespan, all Congressional legislations regarding Hong Kong should explicitly state that they will not be expired by 2047. It would also deliver a clear message to PRC that, since the Engagement Policy fails to liberalize China as planned, the US will not accept further “Mainlandization” of Hong Kong. The original Classical Liberal traditions of Hong Kong should be preserved, and the illiberal measures since 1997 should be all rollbacked.

Back then during the Pacific War, when Hong Kong was under the yoke of ruthless rule by Imperial Japan for most of the territory. The United States Army Air Force and Navy launched multiples air strikes on military installations in Hong Kong, unavoidably, civilian casualties were resulted, but very few survivors held a grunge against the Americans, for they clearly knew who should really be blamed. We should view the current desperate situation in the same manner.

—Appeal to Americans—

Finally, we would like to have a few words to the American societies:

To American Conservatives: Citing a famous quote in the movie “The Usual Suspects”, “the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist”, the greatest trick the Chinese Communist Party ever pulled on Deng Xiaoping’s 1992 “southern tour” was convincing the world that they were not “Communists” anymore. In fact, they are still strictly Leninists in term of Party structure. Their brand of “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics” is, in a nutshell, not Classical Laissez-faire Capitalism, but State Capitalism, whereas Umpires and Ballplayers rolled into one. For anyone, from Corperate America to ordinary folks, seeking business opportunities in China, there is an increasingly NO-win situation. While trade surplus of American’s Allies is mostly used for their domestic welfare programs, PRC use their trade surplus to vastly modernize their military, and their State Apparatus Sino-American relationship before 2016 was obviously not reciprocal, the changes afterward were long overdue, as did the current legislations about Hong Kong.

To American Liberals: You might have a tendency to doubt your own country’s heritage greatness, and show more appreciations toward other nations, while it could be a healthy antidote of excessive jingoism, PRC is not a variable alternative of Pax Americana. They suppressed Human Rights Lawyers, Feminist Activists, a BL erotica novelist, Uyghurs Muslims, Tibetan Buddhists, Christians, no matter official-sanctioned Churches or underground “Family Churches”, with equal rigor, they are against all segments of ideologies or Identity Politics which are not absolutely obedient to CCP.

Had nothing is done on Hong Kong, and if PRC surpassed USA and attains the number one superpower status, the current polarization of Western Politics will be rendered irrelevant, and what happen to us right now, will befall upon all of you.

Dr. Hon. Cheng Chung-tai
Dr. Chin Wan-kan


【An Open Letter to All Members of the United States Congress on Upcoming Legislations Regarding Hong Kong】

https://www.facebook.com/chengchungtai/posts/1303231039851250


標註國語定本:韋昭 解,秦鼎 校,高木熊三郎 注

http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?featureCode=all&searchWord=%E6%A8%99%E8%A8%BB%E5%9B%BD%E8%AA%9E%E5%AE%9A%E6%9C%AC&viewRestricted=0





第四章 焦循 之 《易》 學法則
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35526/6/


http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35526/7/

焦循
http://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&author;=焦循


焦循 《易圖略》
http://www.eee-learning.com/article/3383

http://www.eee-learning.com/book/3385

--

春秋經傳集解



馮李驊、陸浩:左繡-讀左卮言

左繡


춘추경전집해 v1[春秋經傳集解 v1]
http://yoksa.aks.ac.kr/jsp/aa/VolumeList.jsp?mode=&page=1&fcs=f&fcsd=&cf=a&cd=aa16&gb=1&aa10up=kh2_je_a_vsu_A7B%5E2C_000&aa10no=&gnd1=&gnd2=&keywords=&rowcount=10



左氏蒙求-文本整理
https://bikue.tumblr.com/post/79970023389/%E5%B7%A6%E6%B0%8F%E8%92%99%E6%B1%82%E6%96%87%E6%9C%AC%E6%95%B4%E7%90%86


左氏傳蒙求 2卷
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/2538300


左伝蒙求 : 標注
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/753824

--


昌平叢書. 方言藻（李調元撰）　巻上，下
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/898943



春秋左氏伝校本 : 翻刻. 第１，２,風月堂,明13.9
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/753987
https://ndlonline.ndl.go.jp/#!/detail/R300000001-I000000418705-00




春秋左氏伝校本 : 明治新刻. 第１−２,鈴木義宗,明16.1
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/755671

http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?featureCode=all&searchWord=%E6%98%A5%E7%A7%8B%E5%B7%A6%E6%B0%8F%E4%BC%9D%E6%A0%A1%E6%9C%AC+%2C%E9%88%B4%E6%9C%A8%E7%BE%A9%E5%AE%97&viewRestricted=0



春秋左氏伝校本. 附録　巻上,森本太助等
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/753985



春秋左氏伝校本. 附録　巻下,森本太助等
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/753986


129    春秋左氏伝校本. １ 図書,杜預 集解[他] (明徳館, 1883)
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?title=%2F%22%E6%98%A5%E7%A7%8B%E5%B7%A6%E6%B0%8F%E4%BC%9D%E6%A0%A1%E6%9C%AC%22%2F&materialTypeList=0%7C1%7C2%7C4%7C5%7C6%7C7%7C8%7C9%7C92%7C13%7CI&viewRestrictedList=0&biblevelSearch=1&detailSearchTypeNo=A&publisher=%2F%22%E4%BF%AE%E9%81%93%E9%A4%A8%22%2F



130    春秋左氏伝校本. 第１，２ 図書,杜預 集解[他] (内田屋宗兵衛等, 1871)
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?title=%2F%22%E6%98%A5%E7%A7%8B%E5%B7%A6%E6%B0%8F%E4%BC%9D%E6%A0%A1%E6%9C%AC%22%2F&materialTypeList=0%7C1%7C2%7C4%7C5%7C6%7C7%7C8%7C9%7C92%7C13%7CI&viewRestrictedList=0&biblevelSearch=1&detailSearchTypeNo=A&publisher=%2F%22%E5%86%85%E7%94%B0%E5%B1%8B%E5%AE%97%E5%85%B5%E8%A1%9B%E7%AD%89%22%2F



131   春秋左氏伝校本. 第１，２ 図書,杜預 集解[他] (修道館, 1883)
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?title=%2F%22%E6%98%A5%E7%A7%8B%E5%B7%A6%E6%B0%8F%E4%BC%9D%E6%A0%A1%E6%9C%AC%22%2F&materialTypeList=0%7C1%7C2%7C4%7C5%7C6%7C7%7C8%7C9%7C92%7C13%7CI&viewRestrictedList=0&biblevelSearch=1&detailSearchTypeNo=A&publisher=%2F%22%E4%BF%AE%E9%81%93%E9%A4%A8%22%2F


132 

春秋左氏伝校本. １，２ 図書,杜預 集解[他] (大村安兵衛等, 1883)
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?featureCode=all&searchWord=%E5%A4%A7%E6%9D%91%E5%AE%89%E5%85%B5%E8%A1%9B%E7%AD%89&viewRestricted=0


133 春秋左氏伝校本. 第１，２ 図書,杜預 集解[他] (森本太助等, 1882)
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?searchWord=%E6%A3%AE%E6%9C%AC%E5%A4%AA%E5%8A%A9%E7%AD%89&facetOpenedNodeIds=&featureCode=all&viewRestrictedList=0&pageNo=1


134    春秋左氏伝校本. 第３，４ 図書,杜預 集解[他] (森本太助等, 1882)



http://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?searchWord=%E6%A3%AE%E6%9C%AC%E5%A4%AA%E5%8A%A9%E7%AD%89&facetOpenedNodeIds=&featureCode=all&viewRestrictedList=0&pageNo=1

135
鼇頭評註春秋左氏伝校本. １，２
http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/753955